Haematologica
HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, M.
Right arrow Articles by San Miguel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, M.
Right arrow Articles by San Miguel, J.
Haematologica, Vol 89, Issue 10, 1213-1218
Copyright © 2004 by Ferrata Storti Foundation


Comparative Study

The value of fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of 11q in multiple myeloma

MB Gonzalez, JM Hernandez, JL Garcia, E Lumbreras, M Castellanos, JM Hernandez, J Fernandez-Calvo, NC Gutierrez, and JF San Miguel

Departamento de Hematologia, Hospital Universitario & Centro de Investigacion del Cancer, Universidad de Salamanca-CSIC, Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A large number of chromosomal abnormalities have been detected in multiple myeloma (MM). The most frequent are chromosome 13q deletions and translocations affecting the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH). Recent studies using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) have shown that gains of 11q represent one of the most frequent genomic changes in MM. However CGH is not generally used in routine clinical laboratories. DESIGN AND METHODS: In the present study, efficiency of fluorescent in situ analysis (FIS)H analysis in the detection of 11q abnormalities in MM patients was investigated. Cytogenetic and FISH studies with three different specific probes for the regions containing the genes BCL1 (11q13), ATM (11q22) and MLL (11q23) were simultaneously performed in 52 patients: 9 cases with 11q abnormalities detected by conventional cytogenetics and 43 cases without 11q abnormalities. FISH analysis identified 11q aberrations that were undetected by cytogenetics in 16 out the 43 cases (37%). RESULTS: Gains on 11q were present in 13 cases (30%) while rearrangements on 11q were observed in the remaining 3 cases. No losses were found. All 11q gains involved the three regions analyzed (BCL1, ATM and MLL genes) while only rearrangements of BCL1 were observed. In all control cases the 11q alterations were confirmed by FISH. A good overall correlation between CGH and FISH was observed. Nevertheless gains on BCL1, ATM and MLL genes were observed in 3 cases displaying a normal CGH. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: In summary, chromosomal abnormalities on 11q are frequent in MM. FISH studies demonstrate a high sensitivity at detecting this abnormality and should be used in the routine evaluation of MM.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
Copyright © 2004 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation.