Haematologica
HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogunia-Kubik, K
Right arrow Articles by Lange, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bogunia-Kubik, K
Right arrow Articles by Lange, A
Haematologica, Vol 91, Issue 12, 1628-1634
Copyright © 2006 by Ferrata Storti Foundation


Comparative Study

CCR5 deletion mutation and its association with the risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

K Bogunia-Kubik, D Duda, K Suchnicki, and A Lange

Hirszfeld Institut of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences Rudolf Weigl 12, 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland. bogunia@iitd.pan.wroc.pl

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently published data have suggested a potential role of CC chemokine receptor-5 (CCR5) in a mouse model of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). It has also been described that a 32-nucleotide deletion within the CCR5 gene (CCR5Delta32) leads to complete loss of functional CCR5 in subjects homozygous for this mutation and decreased expression in heterozygous individuals. We analyzed CCR5 genotypes and their relationship to transplant outcome. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 349 individuals, comprising 186 recipients and 163 donors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants, were typed for CCR5 polymorphisms. RESULTS: Recipients carrying the CCR5Delta32 allele developed acute GvHD (grades I-IV) less frequently than did patients lacking the CCR5 deletion mutation (11/35 vs. 76/151, p=0.033). This association was still valid after correcting for other known variables (recipient age, donor-recipient gender relation, type of donor, conditioning regimen, diagnosis, stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis) by logistic regression (OD=0.391, p=0.023). Transplantation from a donor other than a matched sibling (OD=2.007, p=0.028), recipient age (OD=2.117, p=0.041) and myeloablative conditioning regimen (OD=2.235, p=0.014) were found to be factors associated with an increased risk of GvHD. Moreover, acute GvHD symptoms were not observed in any of the recipients carrying the CCR5Delta32 allele transplanted from donors with this deletion mutation (0/11 vs. 70/151, p=0.002). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: The presence of the CCR5Delta32 allele in recipients constituted an independent and protective factor associated with a decreased risk of GvHD. This protective effect of the CCR5 deletion mutation was particularly marked in patients transplanted from donors also carrying the CCR5Delta32 allele.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS
Copyright © 2006 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation.